\n
Fortunately, we have antidotes for such sociopathy in the form of civic-minded community leadership, well grounded in the ways of research, analysis and good will….<\/p>\n
\n
For starters, check out a clear-eyed view of Madison’s historic preservation laws brought to you by Brenda Konkel; details here<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a> & here<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n \n Another former alder had this warning<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a> for current alders with regard to bully-proofing themselves.<\/p>\n \n Jay Rath<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a> at\u00a0Isthmus has done a yeoman’s job of\u00a0chronicling the Edgewater saga. He puts Madison’s historic preservation efforts in, well, historic context this week<\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n \n Civic leader Ledell Zellers lays out the moral case for historic preservation laws and the implications of breaking them (i.e., bulldozers coming soon to a neighborhood near you!):<\/p>\n \n Historic Districts in Peril\u2014Speak up to help save Madison\u2019s heritage districts.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n \n The Hammes Co. has appealed the decision of the Landmarks Commission to reject the Edgewater proposal.\u00a0 The proposal was rejected on the basis of it not complying with either the requirements of the Mansion Hill preservation ordinance or the provisions allowing for a variance from the ordinance.\u00a0 The basis of rejection was that the proposed tower, because of its huge size (see attached), is not visually compatible with the small scale buildings with which it is \u201cvisually related\u201d, nor with the historic district scale of buildings.<\/p>\n \n If this decision is overturned by City Council, it would essentially gut the provisions of the landmarks ordinance and open up all Madison historic districts for inappropriate development.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Your voice is needed if you care about Madison\u2019s historic districts. \u00a0 What can you do? <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n \n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Email all alders NOW at allalders@cityofmadison.com to let them know you value our historic districts and you do not want an out of scale building to be built which the Landmarks Commission rejected as inappropriate; and<\/p>\n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Come to the City Council meeting and testify on Tuesday December 8 at 6:30 pm in room 201 of the City County Building.<\/p>\n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 If you cannot stay to testify on Tuesday, please come and register in opposition to this out of scale, inappropriate project in our oldest heritage landmark district.<\/p>\n \n What are some of the issues?<\/p>\n \n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The Landmarks Commission in following their charge under the Landmarks Ordinance rejected the proposed Edgewater tower as too large for the Mansion Hill Historic district.\u00a0 The proposed tower is HUGE.\u00a0 The total gross floor area and gross volume of ALL four buildings combined<\/strong> in the \u201cvisually related area\u201d (an area defined by ordinance) is 60% that of the proposed tower.\u00a0 On an individual basis the proposed tower is 3 to 16 times larger than each of the other buildings.\u00a0 It was this massive tower that the Landmarks Commissioners found violates the ordinance which was established in 1976 to protect Mansion Hill.<\/p>\n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Some people are arguing that building this building would create jobs.\u00a0 Get the size right for the district and go ahead with the project.\u00a0 But don\u2019t build the wrong building in the wrong place simply to make work.\u00a0 The jobs will last for a short period.\u00a0 The historic district will be damaged forever.\u00a0 This mistake will loom over our lake forever.<\/p>\n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Commissions have a basis of knowledge on which they base decisions.\u00a0 The Landmarks Commission considered this issue and discussed it in detail for 7 hours.\u00a0 These are experts, informed citizens and one alder the mayor has appointed to look at details of the historic district ordinances and how they apply in specific situations.\u00a0 To disregard, devalue and dismiss such judgments undercuts the committee process which has been long established and long respected in Madison.<\/p>\n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The appeal ordinance requires that in order to overturn the Landmarks Commission the Council must find \u201cthat, owing to special conditions pertaining to the specific piece of property, failure to grant the Certificate of Appropriateness will preclude any and all reasonable use of the property and\/or will cause serious hardship for the<\/em> owner<\/em><\/span>, provided that any self-created hardship shall not be a basis for reversal or modification of the Landmark Commission\u2019s decision<\/em>.\u201d (Emphasis added.)\u00a0 The Hammes Company does not yet own the land.\u00a0 Other provisions of the appeal ordinance also appear not to be met.\u00a0 Simply because a tower of the size desired by the developer cannot be built it does not preclude any and all reasonable use of the property.\u00a0 Current owners are responsible for the deteriorated state of the 1940s Edgewater.<\/p>\n \u00b7 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The precedent which would be created should this proposal be approved will result in a wall of towers hugging Lake Mendota.<\/p>\n \n Please act to save the Mansion Hill Historic district\u2026to save all Madison historic districts.<\/p>\n \n \n Ledell Zellers<\/p>\n 510 N Carroll Street<\/p>\n Madison, WI\u00a0 53703<\/p>\n ledell.zellers@gmail.com<\/p>\n \n \n \n<\/blockquote>\n My take on the whole thing? <\/span>Ledell for Mayor 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n \n \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Mayor Pave aims to gut historic preservation law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[175,5,12,11,8,452],"tags":[95,372,326,36,623,621,622,624,7,29,1321,51,494,34],"class_list":["post-1150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-architecture","category-environment","category-madison-politics","category-places-that-dont-suck","category-places-that-suck","category-urban-designplanninggeography","tag-auto-centric","tag-brenda-konkel","tag-edgewater-hotel","tag-ethics","tag-hammes-company","tag-historic-preservation","tag-law","tag-ledell-zellers","tag-madison-wisconsin-politics","tag-mayor-pave","tag-places-that-suck","tag-urban-geography","tag-zombie-politicians","tag-zoning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1150"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1150\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1173,"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1150\/revisions\/1173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
![\"Appropriate](\"http:\/\/urbanthoreau.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/VRA-Chart1.jpg\" "\\"VRA")
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n